Record – An assessment of the Litwin and Stringer Organization Climate Questionnaire. Article in Personnel Psychology 28(1) – 38 · December. employees and an organisational climate questionnaire was constructed. The .. The Litwin and Stringer Organizational Climate Questionnaire (LSOCQ) is a. Abbreviation: LSOCQ (>> Co-occurring Abbreviation). Long Form: Litwin and Stringer Organizational Climate Questionnaire.
|Published (Last):||28 July 2010|
|PDF File Size:||14.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.55 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Integration of climate and leadership: The first or categorical approach organizationzl not been very popular or successful. Where scores fall below 2. There are many models which use the concept of climate Litwin and Stringer,Bonoma and Zaltman, but very few specify the exact relationship between climate and other organisational processes.
In all were full-time, had been with the organisation less than 5 years, 65 between 5 and 15 years and over 15 years. Any score below 2 could be considered a sign that that aspect really die no merit close attention. Items were written organizarional each dimension. The potential application of this measure to other occupational settings was discussed, along with its potential use in international analysis.
The Corporate Climate Questionnaire
This is in accordance with previous findings Jackofsky and Slocum Second, although there were some correlates of sex four for the British, four for the Europeans and some of age five for the British, two for the Europeans they were few in number and no clear pattern was discernible. Clearly the validity of a multi-dimensional measure such as the one reported here is not seriously threatened if one or more scales are not used. Climatd are a number of answers to this: This yields face validity evidence.
Previous work has shown that frequently the dimensions of climate are significantly correlated. The questionnaire was given to individuals in their place of work along with a pre-paid envelope to send their replies to an independent outside consultant of analysis.
liwin-stringer Organisational Behaviour and Human Performance9, Correlates The scores on the 14 dimensions for both rated performance aggreement and importance were completed with a variety of demographic variables. But because the term climate has been used in the past it shall be returned here to examine the current literature.
The Corporate Climate Questionnaire
Few researcher and model builders have acknowledge that the climate may be both an independent and dependent variable simultaneously. Reliability A major criterion of the success of any questionnaire is its reliability. There were 84 under 35 years of age, 86 between 36 and 50 and 34 over All were employees of the same airline. Examples of this approach can be seen in the work of Ginsbergwho described three basic climates inception, post-entrepreneurial and bureaucratic and Halpin and Croft who felt climates could be categorised as either open autonomous, controlled, familiar, paternal or closed.
It is important organizationsl note: This paper highlights one other very important issue for the questkonnaire of organizational climate: Bestsellers Our complete range of products are listed below:.
Sixth and finally, the questionnaire should produce a measure that can be used to highlight international differences within and between multi-nationals where appropriate.
A review of theory and research. Employee perception is then interesting but no directly relevant to the functioning of the organisation.
Learning and Training 7. Quality of Service 4.
Conflict Management 5 0. Yet it is important that if orgsnizational additional scales are used that their psychometric properties should be assessed. Correlations in Brackets are between agreement and importance ratings. Environmental variations in studies of organisational behaviour. Sex, age location, job function and nationality yielded minimal differences but seniority did See Table 4.
Payne has argued that the concept of organisational climate is invalid because people in different parts of the organisation have radically different perceptions of the organisation hence the perception is not shared and that where perceptions are consensually shared, in small groups, they are not representatives of the climate of the whole organisation.
The results showed a completely clear pattern: Second, whereas some dimensions. It would be impossible in devising a sensitive and comprehensive measure completely to separate the two. Return back to product page.
It is these items that most warrant most attention particularly the very low performance, high importance.